|
Pine Gap: Treaty Review Report 1998 Index (The Joint Defence Space Research Facility) |
|
An Agreement to extend the period of operation of Joint Standing Committee on Treaties October 1999 © Commonwealth of Australia 1999 Contents Purpose of this report 2 Seeking information from the Department of Defence The National Interest Analysis 3 Seeking information from other sources Introduction
Introduction Appendix A - Extract from Resolution of Appointment
Senator the Hon Chris Schacht, Hon Dick Adams MP, Hon Janice Crosio
MP and Kim Wilkie MP 35 Membership of the Committee Chair The Hon Andrew Thomson MP * Until June 1999 Secretariat Secretary Grant Harrison
a classified briefing on the purpose and operation of the Joint Defence Facility; a copy of the classified agreement that gives operational effect to the Agreement between the Australian Government and the United States Government relating to the Establishment of a Joint Defence Space Research Facility (1966); on-site access to the Joint Defence Facility at Pine Gap; and such other information as may be required to enable the Committee to determine if the treaty action is in Australia's national interest (paragraph 4.21). Recommendation 2 identify the full range of sensitive security-related treaties
and subsidiary agreements to which Australia is a party; recognise
the legitimacy and importance of the reformed treaty making process;
require that briefings provided to the Committee be comprehensive
and at least the equivalent in terms of detail and depth as briefings
provided to the ASIO and NCA Committees of the Parliament, provided
that such briefings be held in camera; and empower the Committee
to request the relevant Ministers to be present during such briefings
to assist the Committee (paragraph 4.22). Conclusion The Joint Standing Committee on Treaties: supports, in principle, the Exchange of Notes constituting an
Agreement between Australia and the United States of America to
further extend the Agreement relating to the Establishment of
the Joint Defence Facility at Pine Gap; and with the limited evidence
made available, finds no reason to object to the continuation
of the Joint Defence Facility (paragraph 4.24). |